The cute guy helped the victim.
Maybe the sister or ex husband.
oop wait so the sister isnāt the ex-husbandās sister, the sister is Tinaās sister.
if that makes since
I meant or. My bad
oh your fine !
& iāll post the results in 2 hours ! FR THIS TIME
What!!! I want to see if Iām right
Maybe that she clicked the button to close the garage but it didnāt actually close? Bācuz her ex-husband didnāt pay the bills or just sum like that ig
here, iāll pm uu
The ex husband got tired of paying tinas bills and so the garage didnāt close but the cute guy saw her drug the victim and put him in the backseat so he asked for her number to slow her down and then he followed her home and helped the victim or the victim just woke up and left idk
The garage door was open.
Electricity was gone, and the garage door did a glitch so it didnāt close. While Tina was talking with her sister, the victim regained consciousness and the bartender(aka cute guy)followed her and helped the victim escape as he most certainly saw her mix drugs in the victimās drink at the bar.
can I post a new crime?
Yeah ofc
Crime (taken from "Norwood builder")
Letās see if you remember the case sherlockians
An rich architect was murdered in his house. His body seemed to be burnt in the backyard and the police only found the remainder of the body such a few bones and all that. Looking for clues through out the house they only found a walking stick and legal papers that said the architect was handing over all his property to Mr. Hector McFarlane. But the architect had neither kith nor kin. Police arrested McFarlane was arrested as he was the only person who would be benefitted by architectās death and McFarlane confirmed it was his stick. The next day police again came back to the house and saw a bloody thumbprint on the wall that matched with McFarlaneās. McFarlaneās detective concluded that McFarlane did not commit the crime. In fact, the architect was alive.
Why?
He was alive as they only found a few bones and he died in his house, how could he be in the backyard.
Then how do you explain the thumbprint
Case undermine
Were they confirmed to be the bones of the architect? I have a few theories.
-
The bones arenāt human and came from a butchered animal. That would explain the bloody fingerprints and the random bones in the backyard.
-
If the bloody fingerprint(assuming the blood was the architects) was only discovered the next day when the police returned, the bones could not have belonged to the architect. A burnt body would not have blood after it was already burnt.
-
I have a sense of connection between the walking stick and the fingerprints. Considering the fact that the walking stick would be covered in McFarleneās fingerprint. It feels like a reach, but is it a possibility that his fingerprints were duped from the stick and placed onto a wall in an attempt to frame McFarlane?
Can someone tag me when you reveal the answer, my brain died trying to get find out the answer
The author of the mystery liked my comment but didnāt respond, so Iām not sure if Iām on the right track.